Sunday, 21 April 2013

Some good cycling updates from Southwark as new cycling and walking footbridge opens. Just needs the rest of the link to come into place now.

Well done Southwark Council. This is the eastern Elephant &
Castle bike bypass. During the works on the bridge, the council
has insisted on a lane for bikes and a lane for pedestrians. 
Well done Southwark Council. During some major works to a rail bridge that runs over the Elephant & Castle cycle bypass, the council has insisted that contractors create a way through for people on bikes and for people on foot. Sensibly (and I wish this were standard practice in the rest of London), they've created a separate track for cyclists and another for pedestrians. The result is that it works for everyone and people feel they have a right to cycle through or walk through that is clearly their space. How different from so much of the rest of London.

I was heading east for a change at Elephant because I wanted to go and look at London's brand new bike and pedestrian-only bridge that was officially opened late last week. The Connect2Southwark Bridge is the result of over a decade's work by Southwark councillors and Southwark Cyclists. 

Bike track on the New Kent Road. Pretty heavily used
Let me guide you on my journey to the Bridge from central London. After I'd nipped through the construction works pictured above, I took Southwark's London Cycle Network routes 22 and 23. And they're pretty impressive, to be honest. You get to whizz along the not bad segregated bike tracks that now extend most of the length of this section of the New Kent Road. The only downside is that you can wait ages at the lights to cross from the bike track over to the other side of the main road. Traffic flow for people in motor vehicles must come before traffic flow for people on foot or bike, of course...(Although, some fairly massive news just in is that Transport for London - which operates all of London's traffic lights - has started reviewing how it models traffic behaviour at traffic lights to better account for pedestrians and cyclists. This is a very significant development, as cyclists and pedestrians are woefully unaccounted for in most of London's traffic planning at the moment)

What follows from here is a whole series of roads that have been nicely traffic-calmed with speed humps and are the sort of thing you might find in parts of Hackney. The only difference is that Southwark hasn't been quite as bold as Hackney and there are no filters along these routes to stop lots of through motor traffic. 

Nifty updated bike crossing of the main road, helped
by speed table to slow the motor traffic and clear access from the
bike track so you can cross the road on a bike. 
You then have options of using the road route or of cycling through the newly revamped Burgess Park. Burgess Park provides a decent east-west off-road route but there's one thing I just fail to understand. There's no street lighting. So, if you want to cycle through here at night, you're at the mercy of the darkness. That's hardly going to inspire most people to use the park as a sensible cycling route. Apparently, the council doesn't want to create light pollution in the park. It's happy to stick excessive lighting all over its estates but not along a major bicycle transport axis. Just weird. 

There are some small but nifty pieces of street design intervention that make a real difference on the journey. Things like this bike crossing pictured on the left. Here, the road traffic is slowed down by a speed table and there is a clear space created for cyclists to position themselves in a way that they can cross the road and carry straight over. Small intervention that makes a big difference. 

Cattle pens on the bike route. These really shouldn't be here. 
The route towards the bike bridge is pretty decent. You pedal your way through 1980s housing estates in a completely straight line through some  nice motor traffic filters that mean only bikes and pedestrians can go all the way through and motor cars have to stick to the main road to get anywhere. It's a fairly decent route. Until you come to these things: Horrible cattle pens (one of which seems to be brand new) that make this route unusable on any sort of larger utility bicycle and just make your heart sink when you see them on a bike. They're basically saying cyclists aren't welcome on their own bike routes. There's simply no need for this sort of rubbish. The Dutch and Danish would use double bike speed humps to slow people down and simultaneously render the route unusable for mopeds. We use horrible cattle pens that have no place on a bike route. 

And then we come to the new bridge itself. It's actually a really exciting and beautiful thing and used, in fact, to be a railway bridge. You can see pictures of the old bridge being removed by crane a few months ago and the new bridge being gently lowered into place. Brand new cycle path; clear bike route signs everywhere you look; plenty of space for pedestrians and people on bikes to get past each other. It's very very nice indeed.

The new bike bridge whizzes you over the Rotherhithe New Road. And then you carry on a few hundred yards on a brand new, wide cycle-and walkway. And then you literally bump into South Bermondsey train station.

The route, proposed by the fabulous Barry Mason of Southwark Cyclists, is intended to continue through the station (there are empty arches immediately either side of the station entrance, just filled with earth and weeds) and then past Millwall stadium and off into Rotherhithe. Except for the time being that's not the case, you literally come to the end of the line and you're left trying to work out where to go next. There is a diversion in place for the time being but I must admit that I struggled to find it last week.

End of the line for now. The new
bike link comes to a halt at South
Bermondsey Station.
Part of the reason that the route doesn't sweep on past the station and into Rotherhithe is that the land on the other side of the station is not in Southwark, it's in Lewisham. So, in order to connect South Bermondsey (in Southwark) to Rotherhithe (also in Southwark), Sustrans (which has been integral to delivering this route) has to convince Lewisham council and a whole host of landowners to allow the route to continue under the railway viaduct.

Sustrans and Southwark council have done a good job here (albeit, I simply can't understand why it's acceptable to build cattle pens on bike routes or not have street lighting on bikes routes either). My understanding is that money had to be raised from all sorts of sources, including Lottery funding and a whole heap of landowners had to provide permission for even the odd few metres of bike track here and there. No small job.

I have to hope that Lewisham council will join the party and help the link to become whole because it will make a fantastic, long-distance route that could really opens up a decent orbital route across a sizeable chunk of south-east London when it's finished. And in the meantime, I'll continue to wonder why on earth infrastructure for bicycle transport is so poorly funded, such that we leave charities to raise the funds together with local councils, which are themselves fairly cash-strapped, whereas many road schemes seem to be funded with largesse from central government.


  1. Yes, cattle pens and other similar arrangements are often a complete obstruction to anyone on a trike (so, that's accessibility rules being broken), and very awkward for those towing trailers (kids, pets, shopping, etc) and tag-a-longs.

    (The one in the picture doesn't look like it would stop a moped, anyway.)

  2. "The Dutch and Danish would use double bike speed humps to slow people down and simultaneously render the route unusable for mopeds."

    I'm unfamiliar with these. Do you have a picture?

    1. David Hembrow explains them here:

      And he's right – for most people on a bicycle you barely notice them. Much above 20 or 25mph you'd be advised to slow down for them. They can make a route unpleasant for mopeds and motorbikes while hardly affecting bicycle users.

  3. My commute takes me across New Kent Road from Balfour Street to Harper Road. Both are quiet roads with some cycle provision. Crossing New Kent Road is such a nasty break in what otherwise a great route. There is the segregated bike track you mention along the south side of New Kent Road, but no safe way of crossing four lanes of traffic. Using the pedestrian crossing a little way to the east is an option, but then there's no equivalent bike track on the north side of the road.

  4. Danny, Appreciate your positive comments regarding our progress, we hope we are getting there. On the gates ( cattle pens) they are existing but we moved them to widen the chicane. We wanted to remove but some residents have raised concerns over ped safety. We will look at this again, including going "Dutch"
    Re Burgess Park - its not really about light pollution but general safety. Lighting in such a large park can make lone cyclists and walkers a target, so we tend not to light them.
    Des Waters, Southwark Council

    1. This notion of giving up on allowing public use of public space for safety reasons is absurdly defeatist. Where does it stop?

      The council has a duty to ensure that public space is both safe and usable. If the officers really feel that job is beyond them, they should resign and let someone more capable take charge.

    2. Des,

      Nice to see someone from Southwark prepared to discuss this stuff in public.

      Want to echo what Danny said regarding LCN23. You've done a really good job by London standards with most of it.. I'd be happy riding most of the route with a ten-year-old, which is a lot more than I can say for certain other boroughs' bits of LCN23. Six miles of cycle route of which five-and-a-half are really quite good.

      There are one or two places though where it appears the council lost its nerve, or vested interests got in the way.. the needless one-way system at the south end of Wells Way, the weird bit of red tarmac that looks like it should have been an off-carriageway cycle lane but isn't, and the Camberwell Church Road dog-leg which could have been avoided with a slight detour through the estates immediately north or south. Am hopeful Quietway funding will eventually be able to rectify that.

      Oh, and please, please ask your colleagues to take another look at the Paxton Roundabout scheme. What was on the table as of February was far, far below Southwark's usual standards in terms of cycling provision. Cyclists using good, quiet roads to the north and south have to either navigate a two-lane 30mph A-road roundabout, crossing *FIVE* lanes of traffic to exit, or get off and push. I know you can do better than that!

    3. Des,

      It is indeed very helpful progress in Southwark - I'm also impressed to see resurfacing happening along sections of LCN 22 and 23. A pedantic note, but it would be very welcome to see the '23' numbered boxes put back under the re-painted 'cycle' carriageway marks on LCN 23. As an irregular user, I almost missed some turns on a recent journey as the numbers had gone!

      Clearer signposting, especially for Burgess Park and connecting LCN 22 and 23, would be very welcome.

  5. @Des Waters -

    There should be a way to design the lighting to improve safety rather than reduce it.... Perhaps a combination of lights and cctv?

  6. I recently came across your blog and have been reading along. I thought I would leave my first
    comment. I dont know what to say except that I have enjoyed reading. Nice blog.
    I will keep visiting this blog very often.
    umrah jeddah flights

  7. Very Informative! This blog is great source of information which is very useful for me. Thank you very much for sharing this!
    Network Support London

  8. Don't hold your breath waiting for Lewisham to continue the route. Lewisham Cyclists asked a FOI about TfL's greenway funding and Lewisham bid for zero - see